《桃花源记》新解

8ae338576e0fb50efe448a3036775b2
Lin Yutang’s Translation:
After a few days, he took leave of them and left. The villagers begged him not to tell the people outside about their colony. The man found his boat and came back, marking a mental note of the direction of the route he had followed. He went to the magistrate’s office and told the magistrate about it. The latter sent someone to go with him and find the place, but they got lost and could never find it again.

Moral:
This fisherman isn’t a man of his word and doesn’t know how to keep a secret. He must have promised the innocent people of the secluded colony that he won’t tell its existence to the outside world. But the moment he exits, he must be already changing his mind. The moral of this Tao’s 1600-year-old story is not to naively believe those who are given to making promises. (This comic interpretation is not so much edifying as diverting of course.)

2 个赞

啥意思?看不懂。

1 个赞

哪里看不懂?

1 个赞

有些人没必要回复吧。为什么需要向他解释呢?我觉得你写得很好呀,值得点赞。

真佩服楼主,被骂成这样也不还嘴,还能静下心交流学术。骂人者正义凛然,好似骂人者未干“”所为之事。

竟然为坛贼张目,看来是旧病复发矣!

照你的逻辑,你这算不算是偷书的行为?
还有,你之前不是劝人大度,怕别人得躁狂症吗,怎么自己这么喜欢钻牛角尖攻击别人呢?

我的发言是为维护公序良俗,你是助纣为虐。王寒北屡教不改,畏威而不怀德,只能棍棒伺候,不能请客吃饭。
你开个小号来骂我,也是见不得光。

他吃你家大米了,你有什么资格管别人怎么样,他又没一直攻击别人。管好你自己,不用在这显摆你所谓的正义。

怎么证明匿名者没有你?怎么证明那个保釐之寄(见到保安或城管裤子都吓尿了吧?)不是你或者别人? 仅凭措辞就能断案?怎么证明你没开小号?这么喜欢造势?顺便一提,有的人不是要言论自由吗,到大街上喊两声呀,在这耍什么威风?

只要有害群之马,桃花源中就不太平。

1 个赞

我觉得这个故事告诉人们在没有十足的把握下不要相信任何人,嘴巴上说得再漂亮也不能证明自己是义士,正所谓口惠而实不至。最好的是不看,不听,不说,保持佛心。

恶虎贪狼沆瀣一气,把乐于奉献分享的志士当夜壶用,急了找坛友免费承载他贪得无厌的私欲,用完就扔,还容不得纠偏!这个风气不肃清,这论坛就僵死了。

看你这语气,像是他犯了什么滔天大罪一样。是人都会犯错,犯了错及时改正就理应原谅(论坛的宗旨是小白伸手党和大神都可以共处,你的理念并不代表论坛的理念,他现在人身攻击别人了?),妄图一棍子把别人打死就能证明你是绝对公正的?

他已经是坛内狂徒,逍遥惯犯了