this dictionary wasn’t found in the monokakido dump so i took the data from somewhere else.
the data was heavily damaged and there was no css, this work was only possible because of the commitment of @sdwfasf and he did a very impressive work, which mirrors the same style as the one from the original dictionary.
the data is updated, it’s the latest one, and i hope you all enjoy this release, it was really hard to come up with it;
thanks again to @sdwfasf for the css work
ご貢献ありがとうございます
Feedback:
Hello, I checked the 旺文社漢字典 第四版.mdx file through Emeditor. I found many duplicates and deleted them all, and I got 63,135 entries in total.
p.s. There are 112,182 entries in the original mdx file.
There, you mentioned this, and I wonder if the updated data is complete now. And why are there so many duplicates in the mdx file?
Feedback:
Some html elements are not working in entries like ‘春秋繁露’.
this mdx was generated by a algorithm, that’s why im pretty sure that it has no errors.
duplicated entries are common among mdict dictionaries , because sometimes we want to display more information about a particular headword.
btw this is the 4th time that I receive criticism from anonymous profiles on this forum, and this makes me think of not publishing more dictionaries.
maybe I’ll work on the rest and publish a torrent in rutracker.
I have no intention of offending you, just speaking the truth. Not only the entries but also their contents are the same, which means they are redundant. Check out for yourself.
once again I’m saying:
it was an algorithm and it’s not possible to have duplicated content in the but it IS possible to have duplicated headwords, which is a common thing among mdicts
now , i hope the staff doesn’t delete my comment again
and I’ll find somewhere else to post dictionaries
I tested your mdx, there are indeed duplicates (both entry and content wise) inside MDX file, such as entry: 㐀. It seems that you do not like that people point out your mistakes, even if the mistakes do exist.
You are really a funny guy.
string comparison != looking by eye
you’re really a funny guy.
deleted the files.
Guys, why all this negativity? If you don’t like someone’s work, do your changes and keep them to yourself or make your own MDX and share, let people decide what they download and use.
Finally after many years, there’s a breakthrough in Japanese dictionary scene and we should encourage heros who do all the hard work.
Hashirama-sama, please keep it up! Cheers.
I’m setting up a new website for publishing my work, it’s clear to me that this forum is managed in a unilateral way, which is unfortunate.
I’ll make sure that people who are serious about japanese can still have good dictionaries
词典网站，讨论“词典数据”是否存在冗余，在我的文化背景中，这并非冒犯“人”。
喜欢讨论、评判“人”的，也没什么好办法，这是交往的成本。
你可以筛选下朋友，只和朋友交流。
Bye
I am not sure you figured out what is happening here. So some users gave feedback on the fact that there are some duplicates in the data, and the words are calm and polite. Why do you think this is negative feedback? Do you think the comments should all be flatters?
There is only one way to avoid criticism: do nothing, say nothing, and be nothing.
