English Homophone Dictionary (En-En)
Ver. 1.0 (red. 14.06.2015)
Number of headwords: 1013.
Number of entries: 1011.
Compiled en Lingvo by EdwART © 2015
................................................
SOURCE: English Homophone Dictionary
http://legacy.earlham.edu/~peters/writing/homofone.htm
An English Homophone Dictionary
Peter Suber, Philosophy Department, Earlham College
	A.L.P. Thorpe, Classics Department, Earlham College

	We're too busy to continue updating this page. Please use and enjoy it as is. For the best current homophone sites, run a Google search.  -Peter Suber and Liffey Thorpe.
	Homophones are words of the same language that are pronounced alike even if they differ in spelling, meaning, or origin, such as "pair" and "pear". Homophones may also be spelled alike, as in "bear" (the animal) and "bear" (to carry). But this list consists only of homophones that are not spelled alike.
	Homonym is a somewhat looser term than homophone, sometimes referring to all homophones and only homophones, and sometimes referring to the subset of homophones that are spelled alike.
	In the entries below, the members of each homophonic set are listed in alphabetical order. Each set is entered only once, at its alphabetically first member. There is no cross-reference unless the initial letters of the members differ. For example, the pair "knot, not" is listed under "knot". Under "not" one finds
	not see knot
	The diamond bullet indicates a cross-reference. But the pair "shear, sheer" is listed only under "shear" with no further cross-reference, because the members begin with the same letter. Occasionally we include a short definition of an unusual word to assure the reader that scribal error is not to blame for listing e.g. apatite or sics.
	When singular homophone nouns are also homophones in the plural, this is indicated in parentheses, e.g. ad (-s), add (-s), adze. Similarly, when homophone verbs remain homophones when inflected in the third person singular, this is indicated in parentheses, e.g. accept (-s), except (-s). The same indication is used when one member of the pair is a noun and the other is a verb, e.g. poor, pore (-s), pour (-s). These variations do not receive separate listings, nor are other inflected forms, such as -ed or -ing, or possessives, listed at all.
	We do include obsolete words when we know of them, such as dain in the pair, dain, deign. But we have made no systematic search for them, and there are undoubtedly very many not yet in our list.
	This list deliberately omits the following types of homophones.
	1
	2 As noted above, we omit homophones that are spelled alike, e.g. bear, bear.
	3 We omit non-English words, e.g. oui, we; nein, nine. We omit non-English words even if they are often heard in English conversation, perhaps as part of canned phrases. Hence we omit carte, as in a la carte, from the list cart, kart.
	4 We omit proper nouns, e.g. Wales, whales; peat, Pete.
	5 We omit letters of the alphabet, e.g. t, tea, tee.
	6 We omit hyphenated compounds. Consequently there are two reasons to exclude the triple, fillip, fill-up, Phillip.
	7 We omit acronyms that have come to be pronounced as words, e.g. WACS in WACS, wacks, wax, whacks.
	8 We omit pairs of words that, when pronounced together, sound like some other single word, e.g. a cord, accord. We stick to this rule even when the relation between a given pair and a given single word is not accidental, e.g. back ache, backache.
	9 We have included standard contractions, hence aisle, I'll, but not contrived contractions even if they could arise in conversation, such as eye'll (as in "My eye'll be on you").
	10 We omit words which differ in spelling from other words only in the use of a possessive apostrophe, e.g. homes, home's. However, when an apostrophe indicates a standard contraction, we will include the pair, e.g.its, it's.
	11 We have omitted common mispronunciations even though, by their nature, they will be heard in conversation. This affects pairs such as taken, takin'. Words that often succeed other words are frequently pronounced as virtual suffixes. But even though oak and maple is pronounced oak'n maple, we did not let this justify including the pair oaken, oak'n.
	12 We omit spelling variations, e.g. analyse, analyze; curb, kerb; glamor, glamour; plough, plow, racket, racquet; theater, theatre.
	It is often a nice question, however, when a spelling variation has become a new word. Manikin is a spelling variation of mannequin; but the former now denotes a bird and the latter a clothing dummy. They are now distinct words, and are listed as homophones below. By contrast, manakin is a spelling variation of manikin, with the same denotation; in our view it is not an independent word and is not listed below.
	13 Dialectal variation poses a serious problem. If we included all pairs that are pronounced alike by speakers of some English dialect, our job would never end. But the only alternatives seem to be to draw an arbitrary line, including only "major" dialects, or to include none as if there were a single "standard" pronunciation of English. Despite the drawbacks of the last-named course, we follow other dictionaries in adopting it. We use standard English pronunciation in the United States. Hence, with apologies to Brooklynites we omit coil, curl; with apologies to Yankees we omit part, pot; with apologies to Hoosiers we omit spatial, special; and with apologies to Southerners we omit lord, lowered.
	Some questionable cases, where even the "standard" pronunciation contains variation, are indicated by "(?)". We have attempted to keep these cases to a minimum.
	When the variation is produced by sloppiness rather than by dialect (a distinction difficult to maintain), e.g. bobbin, bobbing, odder, otter, wet, whet, then we have generally included them with the qualifying "(?)". Our criterion here is whether the pronunciation is commonly heard, not whether it is already recognized as a secondary, acceptable pronunciation in another dictionary.
	Occasionally dialectal variation produces what might be called "disjunctive homophones". Some people pronounce route and rout alike, while others pronounce route and root alike. Our solution was to include both the qualified pairs root, route (?), and rout, route (?). We omit the question marks when a word simply has two acceptable pronunciations and a homophone with each, for example fail, faille, and fill, faille.
	14 Despite the preceding rules, if a group of homophones already makes the list, then an "ineligible" member will be added in brackets, provided that the ineligible member is an English word. Hence we find wacks, wax, whacks \[WACS\] because the first three members qualify on their own; but we do not find whales \[Wales\] because without the ineligible term there is no independent listing.
	Before we stopped updating this page, we received comments and contributions from many readers. We thank Scott Alexander, Carleen Cook, Tim Heiner, Michael W. Judd, Marc Kamens, Hank Langknecht, Vicki Newby, Gordon Schomberg, David Whigham, and John Williams for their contributions.
....................................................
New versions and other dictionaries are available at:
http://www.dadako.narod.ru/paperpoe.htm